Govt Undermines Community Land Rights: Indonesia

Last Wedneday in Ubud the 11th Biennial Conference of the International Association for the Study of Common Property was convened. The five day conference was attended by over 500 scientists, NGO activists and policy-makers who discussed the issue of devolution of natural resources.

According to experts at the conference sidelining customary laws and undermining tribal wisdom in managing Indonesia's rich natural resources is certainly not what the 1945 Constitution espouses, therefore reinterpretation of the supreme law is badly needed to promote prosperity among Indonesians, environmental law and management.

Owen Lynch, an expert from the Center for International Environmental Law, says the content of the 1945 Constitution has been consistently misinterpreted by various governments that administered Indonesia to state their claims to exploit the country’'s natural resources on behalf of national interests.

To make matters worse he says, the present government has not been able to execute Article 18 of the Constitution that acknowledges traditional rights and opens the door for indigenous people to participate in the management of natural wealth. Owen said the government could demonstrate its willingness to recognize traditional rights by revoking a 2005 presidential decree which regulates that the state has the right to take over private property for the sake of public interests.

Indonesia has the richest natural resources in Southeast Asia but is falling behind Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand and Vietnam in terms of prosperity and human development. Critics say the country, which has Asia's largest forests area and is rich in mineral, oil and gas reserves, has failed to manage its wealth for the prosperity of its people.

Experts also fear that the government will privatize the management its rich natural resources by issuing controversial laws such as the 2004 Water Resource Law, the 1999 Forestry Law, the 2001 Oil and Gas Law as well as the bill on energy and mineral resources, all of which were passed for the sake of luring foreign investors.

It makes one wonder just who actually has rights in Indonesia and judging by the outcome of the conference definitely not the land owners or those with traditional rights to land.